OUTLINE
Bickman's study was a field study conducted in Brooklyn, New York. Three male experimenters dressed as a civilian, a milkman or a guard, and asked them one of three things.
- "Can you pick up this bag for me"
- "This man is over-parked at the meter but doesn't have any change - give him a dime"
- "Don't you know you have to stand on the other side of the pole ? This sign says no standing"
RESULTS
89% obeyed the guard, as he was a figure of authority with the power to punish.
57% obeyed the milkman, as he was a figure of authority.
33% obeyed the civilian.
CRITICISMS
1 - Because it was a field experiment, there was a lack of control over variables
- Extraneous variables (variables that can change the outcome such as noise, weather, or crowding which can't be controlled)
- These variables would be easier ti control in a laboratory setting but would reduce the experiment's ecological validity
2 - The participants were selected by opportunity sampling
- There was no knowledge of the person's circumstances or personality type.
- People could have an authoritarian personality, or be late.
3 - The study was unethical
- It was impossible to gain the participant's informed consent
- They also weren't debriefed
- This could've caused embarrassment or distress
4 - Results may be affected by gender
- All the experimenters were male, and people may be more likely to obey men than women.
5 - The study was in one city, in one country
- The study was culturally biased as it was conducted in an individualist culture.
- The results may vary if repeated in a collectivist culture
No comments:
Post a Comment